Boyd, L. (2011). Exploring Alternate
Futures. Green
Teacher (94), 35-38.
Reviewed by Greg Barmby, University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Reviewed by Greg Barmby, University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
In
the article “Exploring Alternate Futures,” Lloyd Boyd presents the idea of
futuring, a concept meant to explore the possibilities of what our future could
look like, depending on the events to come.
Boyd is interested in the cause and effect our actions could have on the
planet and puts forth the idea that thinking about our future can help us
become more aware of the choices we make. According to Boyd, courses in future
studies exist in over fifty universities around the world, but are lacking in the
middle and secondary school levels. An article
in The Futurist, by Stephen Millet
explains that “this process
[of futuring] will help us to make decisions in the present that will have
positive long-term consequences” (p. 39).
Boyd
agrees with this idea, arguing that students need these skills to be able to
deal with the rapid changes occurring in the world today. In response to this way of thinking, Boyd suggests
a project based approach to teaching futuring in a classroom, which he presents
in three steps - scenario writing for alternative futures - the creation of artifacts
from the future, and predicting past events or “backcasting” from a preferred
future to the present day.
In the first part of the project Boyd
describes his four step approach to scenario writing. Firstly, students brainstorm and analyze
current trends by organizing them into categorical systems. Second, they identify the various effects,
beliefs and causes of these trends and make prediction on what the outcomes
will be. Third, the students synthesize
their analysis and place it within an established framework that the teacher
has created, or use the three created by Allen Hammond known as Market World,
Fortress World and the Transformed World.
In the final step of the scenario writing process, students write their
own scenarios in a detailed format that inspires creative thinking and
thoughtful questioning.
The second stage of Boyd’s project
involves the creation of what he refers to as ‘artifacts’ from the future. This includes
items such as creative videos or simple letters and postcards written from
citizens using the new future perspective.
According to Boyd, these creations allow students to think on a more
local level, and help them better understand the impact their future scenarios
would have on the daily lives of future citizens. The artifacts would also serve to assist
students in their comprehension of the scenarios they created and how accurate
they may be in their depiction of the future.
The third and final stage Boyd presents is the
idea of backcasting, in which students choose their preferred vision of the
future and work backwards to highlight policies, programs and actions from the
present day that will help them realize their future scenario. Boyd believes this exercise will help
students create positive changes today by investigating prevention strategies
that may help their futures to be realized.
Boyd’s article can be directly related to
critical thinking, in that the students will analyze, classify, infer, imagine
and identify various concepts, and come to their own conclusions using this
information. I believe the ideas in this article are transferable to the
classroom and could be
adapted in multiple ways, particularly in social studies. For example, exploring multiple futures from
particular points in the past, or creating “what if” scenarios, in which
students alter history and create alternative outcomes. Scenarios could be created such as “What if
Germany was not defeated in World War II?” or “What if Rome never fell?”
The
idea of writing scenarios could also be adapted for students on a more personal
level, by giving them the opportunity to create their own future for the next
50 years of their life or longer depending on the goals of the educator. The students may gain a better understanding
of the long-term trends occurring in the world, and place themselves somewhere
within those movements. This would give
students the opportunity to “be the change [they] want to see in the world”
(Ghandi). The scenarios could also be
written on a more local level, having students examine their school,
neighbourhood or town, which would allow them to see the potential they have to
make to make changes in their own community.
Creating artifacts from the future has a lot
of potential for educators as well. With
this strategy, students could create artifacts from the past and present them
in an art-gallery type format to the class.
This may allow students to begin the process of viewing the world from
another’s perspective. Creating
artifacts in multi-media formats would also help to integrate both English
Language Arts and Technology, making the activity more of a cross-curricular
activity.
The
idea of backcasting could help students create charts or webs of both events
that occurred in the past and events that are happening in the world today. This would guide students understanding of the
cause-effect relationships that exist between the past, present and the future. As an example, students could look at a topic
such as our ‘dependency on oil’ and use this issue to backcast and create
multiple scenarios to change the energy we consumed in our world today. With the current debate about the Enbridge
Pipeline in Northern BC, students could use their critical thinking skills to
analyze this debate and create story-lines based on events that have not yet
occurred. These questions have a lot of
cross-curricular potential as well, and a teacher could meld these ideas with
the current science curriculum in alternative energy sources.
Middle
and Secondary school students need to be engaged in their learning, and learn
about concepts that matter to them.
Teaching futuring will allow students to think more about the
consequences of their actions and choices they make. Futuring is a concept I believe can easily be
incorporated into any social studies curriculum, and if used correctly it can
be a way to engage students in their attempt to understand the past, realize
the present and envision the future.
Millett, S. M. (2011). Five Principles of Futuring. Futurist,
45(5), 39-41.
Boyd, L. (2011). Exploring Alternate
Futures. Green
Teacher (94), 35-38
No comments:
Post a Comment